> FWIW, we're currently putting together (with a lot of help from Subbu
> Sastry) an optimizing compiler for JRuby that can do things like
> inline Ruby code, propagate constants and types, eliminate dead
> code...all the bits and pieces an optimizing compiler would do, if we
> had an optimizing compiler backend we could reuse. The ideal situation
> would be that we'd use our optimizing compiler to produce optimized
> JRuby IR, and then feed that into the JVM-targeting optimizing
> compiler in Janino to produce the best-possible-bytecode for our
> best-possible-IR.

Have you all looked at Soot and the related libraries from McGill
(http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/soot/)?

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM 
Languages" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.


Reply via email to