https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514751
--- Comment #8 from [email protected] --- Hi Jackob, First, i'm not very favorable to use IA to implement main features or changes. I uses IA in my office, mainly MistralAI, for small changes, tips, codes review (especially when it's not documented in algorithms), small bug fix. Students that i mentor at works uses more deeply AI, with a lots of side effects, or wrong code direction. This always need important review and fixes. But in your fork, i must admit that the code is well written, well documented, with the right coding style and is easy to review. My Q is : which Ai did you uses to implement this codes ? I will checkout your fork while this week and test it to see if side effect appears and to review the GUI changes. Thanks to contribute, it's appreciate. Maik, I would also have your feedback about this implemented features to see if we will continue or not with these changes Thanks in advance Gilles -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
