https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514751
--- Comment #9 from Jakob Linke <[email protected]> --- (In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #8) > Hi Jackob, > > First, i'm not very favorable to use IA to implement main features or > changes. I uses IA in my office, mainly MistralAI, for small changes, tips, > codes review (especially when it's not documented in algorithms), small bug > fix. Students that i mentor at works uses more deeply AI, with a lots of > side effects, or wrong code direction. This always need important review and > fixes. > > But in your fork, i must admit that the code is well written, well > documented, with the right coding style and is easy to review. My Q is : > which Ai did you uses to implement this codes ? I've extensively tried all major providers and claude currently wins hands-down. I've been using it professionally in high-stakes settings, and frankly it's good enough that I no longer write any code myself - so I can only recommend you give it a try. Thanks for the unbiased look. If you're good with this state, I'll create the MR and we can continue discussing there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
