On Saturday 15 March 2008, David Faure wrote: > On Saturday 15 March 2008, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > They would be _much_ > > better if automoc would use only the STL (that would also make building > > Qt with cmake easier). > > True. But that means rewriting it almost completely... (and QProcess is not > easy to replace in a portable way).
Yes, QProcess is probably the hard one. Kitware has a lot of stuff in their kwsys library, also a cross platform process, but I think this one is not that powerful. > > I think it should be possible to use it also from other build tools, but > > I guess Scons does the work in python, qmake has the feature, what about > > autotools and Qt4 ? > > Well the kde4automoc.cpp code calls cmake, but I noticed now > that it's just for details indeed (colorized output). Yes. Beside that, I think cmake should natively be able to parse pkgconfig files instead of relying on the pkg-config executable, which won't work e.g. for cross compiling :-/ And it would fix the issues where the pkgconfig files are just not correct. And it would make it faster. Alex _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
