On Thursday 24 April 2008, Matthias Kretz wrote: > On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > FWIW, if kwsys has an adequate replacement for QProcess I might just > > > volunteer to do the porting and get my feet wet with the STL. > > > > If nobody objects, I'll copy automoc tomorrow to kdesupport > > (is there actually a svn copy ?) > > I guess we can name it "automoc4" then ? > > svn cp sure exists. svn mv is just svn cp + svn rm > > "automoc4" sounds good. I don't think we need the KDE or Qt prefix. > > How about the last patch I posted? AFAICT the cost of running automoc > unconditionally (if it doesn't touch anything unnecessarily) isn't very > high. Anybody else tried the patch?
Hmm, the "touch" isn't portable to Windows. I agree with David, I wouldn't commit it for now. Alex _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
