On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > FWIW, if kwsys has an adequate replacement for QProcess I might just > > volunteer to do the porting and get my feet wet with the STL. > > If nobody objects, I'll copy automoc tomorrow to kdesupport > (is there actually a svn copy ?) > I guess we can name it "automoc4" then ?
svn cp sure exists. svn mv is just svn cp + svn rm "automoc4" sounds good. I don't think we need the KDE or Qt prefix. How about the last patch I posted? AFAICT the cost of running automoc unconditionally (if it doesn't touch anything unnecessarily) isn't very high. Anybody else tried the patch? -- ________________________________________________________ Matthias Kretz (Germany) <>< http://Vir.homelinux.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
