Its sad that this got completely ignored by the members of this discussion, the argument is very valid.
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Luigi Toscano <[email protected]> wrote: > Il 19 settembre 2015 12:00:11 CEST, Vishesh Handa <[email protected]> ha > scritto: > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Luca Beltrame <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > And besides... hasn't the BitKeeper story taught us *anything*? > > > > > > > I don't know about you guys, but it has taught me that we can be > > pragmatic and use proprietary software when the need arises. > > > There is a big FLOSS project I spend my daily work for, called OpenStack. > Given its target, contributions comre from companies and certainly normal > users are not too interested about it and even more about how it is > developed. Despite this, it has a strong manifesto with interesting values: > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Open > > and that extends to the infrastructure too. Leaving aside the usage of > launchpad for bugs (there is a replacement which is advanced state of > development), guess what? Infra team has an own git, contributions go to > the internal gerrit. Github is just a mirror and I didn't hear anyone > screaming or complaining about loss of contributions. > > Now, if they can do that, why can't we do it? > > Ciao > > -- > Luigi > _______________________________________________ > kde-community mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community > -- Shantanu Tushar (UTC +0530) http://www.shantanutushar.com
_______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
