On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Kevin Krammer <[email protected]> wrote: > Where "ahead" could also mean wrong if "klmn" needs to be modified or gets > rejected. > > Is (b) the problem people keep discussing about? > > Because as far as I can tell it is not really an option given that it can lead > to an inconsistent state of two clone sources that are considered to be > mirrored. >
Yup (b) can be problematic. I think read-only means read-only and the developer has to push the patch manually in kde's git repo, which is then mirrors onto github. > If the problem is somewhere in (a), where is it? > From what I understand, people are against some discussion or pull requests being allowed at all. They should always be closed with a big NO sign. I don't understand this or see the distinction between github, email, and some other website. -- Vishesh Handa _______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
