On Saturday, 2015-09-19, 17:44:35, Vishesh Handa wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Kevin Krammer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Where "ahead" could also mean wrong if "klmn" needs to be modified or gets > > rejected. > > > > Is (b) the problem people keep discussing about? > > > > Because as far as I can tell it is not really an option given that it can > > lead to an inconsistent state of two clone sources that are considered to > > be mirrored. > > Yup (b) can be problematic. I think read-only means read-only and the > developer has to push the patch manually in kde's git repo, which is > then mirrors onto github.
For me option (b) is theoretical, nobody would want a mirror to be out of sync. As for read-only: I don't see any way around that neither automated push nor pull would be an option. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
