On 2012-09-20, David Faure <fa...@kde.org> wrote: > We really need a FHS addition for libexec.
not really. the libexec executables is in general a implementation detail of the given library. We have the rare case in KDE that we actually call other libraries' executables, which is a different thing, and one I have the impression is declining a bit. ..and by sharing libexec locations between unrelated libraries, we get the joys of possible collisions, of executing other libraries implementation details by accident with all the mess that is created by that. /Sune
