Well that is not entirely correct. We can definitely implement support for private mode in the cookiejar itself easily. There are a couple of approaches we can take. The difficult part has always been how to handle the "private session" cookies in the cookie management dialogs. Anyhow, I promised to try and implement this for 4.10, but I could not find the time. Perhaps I will find some time during the upcoming holidays.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:18 PM, andrea diamantini <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I'm obviously trying. > My first attempt was a tiny change in the KCookieServer/KCookieJar API to > let people search just for persistent cookies. > But it failed. > I'm currently working on a second attempt following the same approach. If > not, I though about implementing a different jar for the private sessions. > But this second idea is probably an "hard" change in the kde cookie jar. > I fear that "private sessions" are exactly the opposite idea around what > the "monolithic" & "share it with every app" kde cookie jar is builded. > > > 2012/12/17 David Faure <[email protected]> > >> On Sunday 16 December 2012 18:41:31 andrea diamantini wrote: >> > - New private browsing mode (NOT based on KIO, as it seems our >> cookiejar is >> > not enough "malleable" for it. At least in kde4) >> >> Are you working on patches to make it "malleable" enough in the future? >> >> If you need something, make it happen, don't just hope for others to do >> so :) >> >> -- >> David Faure, [email protected], http://www.davidfaure.fr >> Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5 >> >> > > > -- > > > Andrea Diamantini > WEB: http://www.adjam.org > > rekonq project > WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org > IRC: rekonq@freenode > > >
