The issue looks very similar, yes.
2012/12/19 Sebastian Kügler <[email protected]> > On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 23:14:01 Dawit A wrote: > > Well that is not entirely correct. We can definitely implement support > for > > private mode in the cookiejar itself easily. There are a couple of > > approaches we can take. The difficult part has always been how to handle > > the "private session" cookies in the cookie management dialogs. Anyhow, I > > promised to try and implement this for 4.10, but I could not find the > time. > > Perhaps I will find some time during the upcoming holidays. > > Is this the same issue that we can't set an empty cookiejar on the webview? > This issue bit me a while ago when using kdewebkit for an oauth > implementation, I need an empty cookiejar there because I don't want to > authenticate an already logged in user. This didn't seem possible, and I > think > the problem still exists. afiestas ran into the same issue. > > Or maybe I'm confusing this? :) > -- > sebas > > http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 > -- Andrea Diamantini WEB: http://www.adjam.org rekonq project WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org IRC: rekonq@freenode
