2014-02-17 13:55 GMT+01:00 Lukáš Tinkl <[email protected]>: > Dne 17.2.2014 11:51, Harald Sitter napsal(a): > >> Ahoys >> >> I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a >> system is using Logind I guess KDM+CK doesn't do much useful, so the >> question arose whether distributions with such a lineup should build >> without CK support. In short: >> >> If the rest of the system uses Logind, should KDM be built without CK >> support? >> >> Would building without CK support reduce user functionality, and if so >> aren't we then essentially requiring distributions that use KDM to >> continue using CK until Plasma Next comes along? (we are not >> communicating this very if this is the case). > Hi, > I'm not entirely sure about kdm but for the rest of the code in > kde-workspace (kworkspace, powerdevil et co.), login1 support is fairly > complete and preferred over CK. We are using a KDE 4.11 systemd running on pure logind in Tanglu without any reported issues. KDM has multiseat patches applied, which were taken from[1]. We also adjusted some other dependencies, but that was just minor work on the packaging. So yes, you can use KDM with logind, but I am not sure that using it at all will make sense long-term, since KDM is dead now. Cheers, Matthias
[1]: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112294/diff/
