On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Rex Dieter <[email protected]> wrote: > Harald Sitter wrote: > >> Right, but short of patching KDM to gain proper logind support, should >> one build with or without CK, > > build without it. > >> i.e. does CK add anything useful if the >> rest of the system is not using it anyway > > no. As I understand it, this is the only case where you'd want to consider > keeping CK support, if you had apps that still used the CK-api to check for > active sessions.
Okey dokey, thanks guys. <3 HS
