Harald Sitter wrote: > Right, but short of patching KDM to gain proper logind support, should > one build with or without CK,
build without it. > i.e. does CK add anything useful if the > rest of the system is not using it anyway no. As I understand it, this is the only case where you'd want to consider keeping CK support, if you had apps that still used the CK-api to check for active sessions. -- Rex
