Well, _obviously_ reviewboard supports raising issues and adding comments
, but neither facilitates actual conversation, i.e. discussion on what's
up with a particular patch at a deeper level.
In short, what I meant is that as a tool to dicuss code changes,
Reviewboard is a poor thing. It facilitates nit-picking, which is
off-putting and useless, but at least gives the reviewer the feeling he's
done his job, while it fails at making it easy to discuss the why,
wherefore and how of a particular change.
On Mon, 5 Jan 2015, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dilluns, 5 de gener de 2015, a les 18:40:54, Boudewijn Rempt va escriure:
I do agree, btw, with Ian, that the current reviewboard workflow is badly
broken and can be very discouraging. It doesn't support conversation
What do you mean it doesn't support conversation?
Cheers,
Albert
