El Dilluns, 5 de gener de 2015, a les 22:26:24, Boudewijn Rempt va escriure: > Well, _obviously_ reviewboard supports raising issues and adding comments > , but neither facilitates actual conversation, i.e. discussion on what's > up with a particular patch at a deeper level. > > In short, what I meant is that as a tool to dicuss code changes, > Reviewboard is a poor thing. It facilitates nit-picking, which is > off-putting and useless, but at least gives the reviewer the feeling he's > done his job, while it fails at making it easy to discuss the why, > wherefore and how of a particular change.
Well, how would you want to have a proper discussion then? What's your desired workflow/UI for it? I see what you mean, but to me it seems more a misuse of the tool by the community, not a fault of the tool itself. Cheers, Albert > > On Mon, 5 Jan 2015, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dilluns, 5 de gener de 2015, a les 18:40:54, Boudewijn Rempt va escriure: > >> I do agree, btw, with Ian, that the current reviewboard workflow is badly > >> broken and can be very discouraging. It doesn't support conversation > > > > What do you mean it doesn't support conversation? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Albert
