On 17/05/2025 02:20, Nate Graham wrote:
you skillfully adapted or re-wrote its output using your human brain
to fit the context, then the result was fine and no policy could
prevent this, so that part is sort of moot IMO.
It still possibly contains code that is against KDE's licenses. And if
they rewrite the whole thing from scratch then it's their code, but it
is highly unlikely that the contributors using AI would do that, they
want to take the easy road. I agree though that no policy can prevent a
user using AI and claiming the code as their own, but we have to attempt
to reduce the liability as much as possible.
I would even be for adding a checkbox in the Merge Request template
requiring users to declare that no AI was used in this contribution. The
same can go in the Bugzilla tickets.
Justin
