This is a complex topic that could go on for ages.

For me, if I can tell you used AI for something, it's because the result wasn't good, and had that "obviously AI" flavor to it. You wasted both of our time and some of the planet's resources.

For this reason, we already have written guidance against using AI to write your blog posts: https://ev.kde.org/rules/reimbursement_policy/#after-the-event. I would be in favor of extending this somewhere to also cover Bugzilla, email, etc, because every single instance of these where I can tell it was AI, it's bad and time-wasting.

But if I couldn't tell you used AI, because you skillfully adapted or re-wrote its output using your human brain to fit the context, then the result was fine and no policy could prevent this, so that part is sort of moot IMO.


Nate

Reply via email to