On 08/11/2014 01:10 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote:
On Monday 11 of August 2014 13:05:19 Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote:
Hi Milian
As someone with no clue:
a) what's the advantage of having a native widget style, compared to using
QtCurve settings?
None, except that you need someone working on qtcurve
Are there things missing / not implementable in QtCurve?
Everything is implemementable in QtCurve, though not via a simple text
config file. So here also, you need someone to do it.
As someone else just watching: QtCurve is a KDE project now, shouldn't this
help a bit?
... not my take. I am not volunteering (for lack of time and code
knowledge) to work on QtCurve code base.
Nor did it come in the discussions when I volunteered on starting with a
breeze widget style 'from scratch', based on the code I knew best.
b) do you share the git history, i.e. did you do a proper fork, or did you
reimport the sources and started from scratch (I hope not).
For breeze I reimported the needed parts of oxygen sources and started
from scratch, mostly because a large fraction of the code from oxygen is
overkill for Breeze's needs.
... which does not mean that history (which could contain important hints
about the code) should be nuked.
No history got nuked. Oxygen's history is still there (in oxygen's
repository), and will stay there, with all relevant hints.
The Breeze style I worked on is a new project, for which I imported some
code from elsewhere (here oxygen).
Ciao
_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
