On Monday 11 August 2014 14:20:26 Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Monday 11 of August 2014 14:08:35 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > On Monday 11 August 2014 13:10:39 Luigi Toscano wrote: > > > On Monday 11 of August 2014 13:05:19 Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote: > > > > Hi Milian > > > > > > > > > As someone with no clue: > > > > > > > > > > a) what's the advantage of having a native widget style, compared to > > > > > using > > > > > QtCurve settings? > > > > > > > > None, except that you need someone working on qtcurve > > > > > > > > > Are there things missing / not implementable in QtCurve? > > > > > > > > Everything is implemementable in QtCurve, though not via a simple text > > > > config file. So here also, you need someone to do it. > > > > > > As someone else just watching: QtCurve is a KDE project now, shouldn't > > > this > > > help a bit? > > > > hey guys, I find this a rather strange topic for discussion. We are very > > happy that Hugo stepped up to write a native style. Questioning why he > > didn't use QtCurve seems absurd to me. > > I find this answer a bit overracting. > I didn't do "questioning" police-style; I asked. End of story. If you don't > expect question, don't put "> Comments, objections, blessings, are welcome" > at the end.
I agree. Really, I'm thankful for Hugo is doing and has done for KDE. But since I have no clue about styles (I even said so!) I wanted to ask what the advantage of a native style over a QtCurve config file are. Hugo answered that. So whats the deal Martin? Bye -- Milian Wolff m...@milianw.de http://milianw.de _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
