On Monday 11 of August 2014 14:08:35 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Monday 11 August 2014 13:10:39 Luigi Toscano wrote: > > On Monday 11 of August 2014 13:05:19 Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote: > > > Hi Milian > > > > > > > As someone with no clue: > > > > > > > > a) what's the advantage of having a native widget style, compared to > > > > using > > > > QtCurve settings? > > > > > > None, except that you need someone working on qtcurve > > > > > > > Are there things missing / not implementable in QtCurve? > > > > > > Everything is implemementable in QtCurve, though not via a simple text > > > config file. So here also, you need someone to do it. > > > > As someone else just watching: QtCurve is a KDE project now, shouldn't > > this > > help a bit? > > hey guys, I find this a rather strange topic for discussion. We are very > happy that Hugo stepped up to write a native style. Questioning why he > didn't use QtCurve seems absurd to me.
I find this answer a bit overracting. I didn't do "questioning" police-style; I asked. End of story. If you don't expect question, don't put "> Comments, objections, blessings, are welcome" at the end. Ciao -- Luigi _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
