Hi Il giorno 17/giu/07, alle ore 21:12, Kevin Ottens ha scritto: > Le dimanche 17 juin 2007, Jakob Petsovits a écrit : >> On Saturday, 16. June 2007, Jakob Petsovits wrote: >>>> 3) media-optical-video >>>> In any case, we'll need a generic icon like the one we have for >>>> media-optical-audio. Then the question is, do we want the dvd, >>>> hddvd, >>>> blueray ones? (that would mean four icons in total for the >>>> media-optical-video namespace: media-optical-video-dvd, >>>> media-optical-video-hddvd, >>>> media-optical-video-blueray and media-optical-video itself) >>> >>> In line with my reasoning from above, that would rather be >>> - media-optical-video >>> - media-optical-dvd, media-optical-hddvd, media-optical-bluray >>> - media-optical-video-dvd, media-optical-video-hddvd, >>> media-video-optical-bluray >> >> Er, oops. The last one obviously needs to be the other way round. > > Well, honestly I don't think we need that many icons... The user > don't care > IMO about media-optical-dvd, etc. It doesn't add any value. That's > also why > I'm not a strong proponent of the media-optical-video-* ones. The > basically > wants to know if there's a video on his medium, he probably doesn't > care if > it's blueray, dvd or hddvd.
I think these will be needed in the future. For example, a video player that handle different media video formats may require an icon for each of them. But I think we should first focus on the devices needed now, and then when it cames we can add more. David David Vignoni, [EMAIL PROTECTED] OXYGEN icon theme director and designer _______________________________________________ Kde-hardware-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-hardware-devel
