----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106863/ -----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated Oct. 15, 2012, 4:17 p.m.) Review request for Solid. Changes ------- Ifdef out all DPMS related stuff in the DPMS action when compiling. The action skeleton with the isSupported() function remains (which always returns false then) while the DPMS stuff goes. Compiles both with DPMS enabled and disabled. Description ------- That message usually appears when starting before the Desktop is up, causing an ugly 1990's passivepopup dialog on the screen, and its contents are not really novice-user-resolvable. On my machine it always claims "The profile Battery tried to activate DPMSControl which is a non-existent action.", which is when I compile powerdevil myself that DPMS stuff is not compiled (DPMS build requirements not met here) and so the action floats around in the config but cannot be triggered anyways. (Imho this is a really infamous message, have seen it quite often on other machines *duck*). All the other actions seem to be installed anyways, so this missing action poses no threat. I guess a kWarning would be sufficient for this. Diffs (updated) ----- powerdevil/daemon/actions/CMakeLists.txt db9ca47 powerdevil/daemon/actions/dpms/powerdevildpmsaction.cpp a16bf7e powerdevil/daemon/powerdevilactionpool.cpp 484c271 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106863/diff/ Testing ------- Compiles. The previous passivepopup does not appear anymore. Did not test whether the kwarning is triggered, though. (Dunno how to get powerdevil debug console output) Thanks, Kai Uwe Broulik
_______________________________________________ Kde-hardware-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-hardware-devel
