> On Oct. 24, 2012, 11:09 a.m., Oliver Henshaw wrote:
> > powerdevil/daemon/powerdevilactionpool.cpp, lines 102-109
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106863/diff/3/?file=90668#file90668line102>
> >
> >     Is isSupported checked everywhere it should be? Remember that this 
> > should work when DPMS is configured in but the display doesn't support DPMS 
> > (e.g. qxl or vmware displays in a VM)

I ifdef'd out all the DPMS-related stuff but it would probably also be good to 
add a
if (action) {
  if (action->isSupported()) {
    action->onProfileLoad();
  }
} else { …
to powerdevilcore so it doesn't load an action if it is not supported.


- Kai Uwe


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106863/#review20781
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 15, 2012, 4:17 p.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106863/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 15, 2012, 4:17 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Solid.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> That message usually appears when starting before the Desktop is up, causing 
> an ugly 1990's passivepopup dialog on the screen, and its contents are not 
> really novice-user-resolvable.
> On my machine it always claims "The profile Battery tried to activate 
> DPMSControl which is a non-existent action.", which is when I compile 
> powerdevil myself that DPMS stuff is not compiled (DPMS build requirements 
> not met here) and so the action floats around in the config but cannot be 
> triggered anyways. (Imho this is a really infamous message, have seen it 
> quite often on other machines *duck*). All the other actions seem to be 
> installed anyways, so this missing action poses no threat. I guess a kWarning 
> would be sufficient for this.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   powerdevil/daemon/actions/CMakeLists.txt db9ca47 
>   powerdevil/daemon/actions/dpms/powerdevildpmsaction.cpp a16bf7e 
>   powerdevil/daemon/powerdevilactionpool.cpp 484c271 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106863/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Compiles.
> The previous passivepopup does not appear anymore. Did not test whether the 
> kwarning is triggered, though. (Dunno how to get powerdevil debug console 
> output)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kai Uwe Broulik
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-hardware-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-hardware-devel

Reply via email to