On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Johannes Sixt <[email protected]> wrote: > Ian Monroe schrieb: >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote: >>> * should we use a patch-submission-and-review system? (probably not) >> >> no. > > Don't throw patch submission and review into the same bucket. I can > understand that you want to dispense with patch submission. But if KDE had > a good culture of *review* from the beginning, there wouldn't be so many > crap commits in the SVN.
Having a system to do this isn't a bad idea, but its not something that needs to be solved now. > A network of trust with a hierarchy of maintainers would foster the review > culture. Well in no way is this going to happen. KDE is nothing like Linux. Anyways I consider this to be pretty much off-topic, since frankly this is a discussion to have on [email protected] and there's frankly no way the answer would be anything but no. There's actually concern in the opposite direction, that even a central git repo system is still too de-centralized. Ian _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
