On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:52:23PM +0100, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> All of them contain the imported history. >> > ok. > not that i understand the need for separate repositories for the > "live" branches in the first place, but whatever. :} > > anyway, note that the historic (cvs) branches in our svn repo are still > screwed up. that means that either somebody invests time into fixing > cvs2svn and fixes the history retroactively (i have coolo's ok for that, > just no time for it) or that the history is cut (after the ad-hoc fixes > and general reorganizations that happened in svn after the import) (it > would be still possible to make the history available in git via a graft > at some later point).
What's messed up? We've gone this long without trouble. :) > btw, does any svn => git tool understand module moves within a bigger > repository or would the history before the last move be lost anyway? > that's not relevant to amarok in case it was never moved, but it > certainly affects a lot of kde in general. Amarok was moved (extragear was reorganized at the CVS->SVN transition) and even git-svn doesn't have any trouble following the change. Ian _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
