On Sunday 29 November 2009, Ian Monroe wrote: > 2009/11/28 ComputerDruid <[email protected]>: > > I just read on the gitorious blog about a solution to the problem > > we had about having too many people emailed about merge requests. > > From the wording used, it seems that this was done specifically for > > us (although perhaps other projects wanted it too). > > > > http://blog.gitorious.org/2009/11/26/repository-permissions/ > > > > I presume this does what we need? > > I think it might solve our current situation with Amarok. We could > create a new group 'amarok-reviewers', it would have the 'review' bit > and we'd remove the remove bit from kde-developers. Maybe this is > what Johan had in mind. > > It doesn't sound very scalable though to have all the groups for KDE > though. And coupling 'ability to change status of merge request' with > 'receiving email about merge requests' doesn't make much sense. Its > certainly quite cumbersome.
So it's possible to tie 'receiving email about merge requests' to a special group? Then we could (as workaround) solve the problem with a service similar to CommitFilter (provided the merge request notifications contain the information necessary for filtering). Regards, Ingo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
