On 28.03.10 23:48:48, Cornelius Schumacher wrote: > On Sunday 28 March 2010 Thomas Zander wrote: > > > > $ git clone git://gitorious.org/svn2git/kde-ruleset.git > > $ grep 'create repository' kde-ruleset/* > > > > Each of those lines will be its own project with one or more repositories. > > Attached is the slighthly edited output of this commands. In this form it > doesn't really make sense. This would be an insane number of projects, > especially for extragear I doubt that every single application needs its own > project. > > If we take the directory as project and the name as repo it makes more sense, > but there are still quite some inconsistencies: > > * Kate and KDevelop have plugins as top-level project names. I guess they > should be repos in the respective main projects.
So far we (the kdevelop team) were not aware of any relation between the names of the rule-files and the repo layout, hence the way the rules are right now. Our plan currently is to have 1 project for kdevplatform+kdevelop+maintained plugins not (yet) part of either of the two. Then there'd be a quanta project probably which has the webdev-stuff. All other plugins (especially stuff from playground) should start in its own project. Andreas -- You have the power to influence all with whom you come in contact. _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
