2010/3/28 ComputerDruid <[email protected]>: > On Sunday 28 March 2010 20:05:22 Ian Monroe wrote: >> Yea I guess I was. Many projects will want to have multiple >> repositories, or at least the option to have them, in a commons. >> Useful for feature branches or for old historic branches. You start >> sticking all of even just extragear/multimedia into one project and >> that would get messy. > People have said this before, but I'm not sure it makes sense to me. Why > should a feature branch be in a different repo from mainline? Since repos can > have multiple branches, having a second repo with a common ancestor seems > pointless to me. > > Your other points make sense though.
You probably want the ability to do force pushes in a repo containing feature branches, whereas its a Very Bad Thing for the mainline repo. Ian _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
