On Sunday 28 March 2010 20:05:22 Ian Monroe wrote: > Yea I guess I was. Many projects will want to have multiple > repositories, or at least the option to have them, in a commons. > Useful for feature branches or for old historic branches. You start > sticking all of even just extragear/multimedia into one project and > that would get messy. People have said this before, but I'm not sure it makes sense to me. Why should a feature branch be in a different repo from mainline? Since repos can have multiple branches, having a second repo with a common ancestor seems pointless to me.
Your other points make sense though.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
