On Sunday 27 of June 2010 19:22:34 Tom Albers wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 09:48:32 -0700, Chani <[email protected]> wrote: > > every single time the matter was brought up, the end was the same. so > > anyone > > who wants to comment further on this thread: please, *please* go read > > the > > > archives first. > > Ok, but some things have changed since we moved from gitorious to our own > solution, which might be relevant. > > We now have redmine. Redmine is used to create the structure we need, as > in extragear, playground, kdereview and the main modules. This means that > moving an application from playground to kdereview to extragear is as easy > as reparanting the project page to the right parent (kdereview and after > that extragear).
> But this gets complicated when all apps are into one big module based > repository. Moving KMail from kdepim to extragear would not be possible > while preserving the history. This is imho important to know and consider. And what's wrong with making kdereview (or review) or extragear or playground being git branches of module in question? Moving apps between those is trivial in such case - it also preserves whole history of course. Having separate repository for kdereview sounds suboptimal (with git). That being said I cannot think of any disadvantages of module per repo configuration other than repo size considerations. -- regards MM _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
