Am Sonntag, 27. Juni 2010, 23:22:00 schrieb Thomas Zander: > On Sunday 27. June 2010 21.45.45 Jens-Michael Hoffmann wrote: > > > > IIRC, "the ones who do the work" wanted monolithic Git repos for some > > > > reasons and "the ones who wanted split packages" for some other > > > > reasons did not have the time to do the work. In KDE world, that's a > > > > decision. > > > > > > > > :) > > > > > > not only that, but after a few rounds of bikeshedding on this matter, > > > thiago showed up and said that the kdegames guys (and other modules) > > > had been consulted ages ago and were fine with one repo per module. I > > > think we consulted them a second time and got the same thing again > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > every single time the matter was brought up, the end was the same. so > > > anyone who wants to comment further on this thread: please, please go > > > read the archives first. > > > > I did read the mailing list archives and could not see that a decision > > was made. > > There are several places where this has been made clear, but for sure I > agree that the amount of mails this topic starts is significant. > The best place to see a decision is clearly made is here; > http://gitorious.org/svn2git The sources :-) > The rulesets are the product of the work done by people that, well follow > up on the decision. And they are not splitting modules. > > Its a made decision, many many manhours have been going in after that > decision was made executing it, there is no way to change it now.
I maintain that there was no decision made. Of course you are right when stating for some modules rules now exist which don't split the modules. However I only consider this a default. Every application team should be able to decide for themselves if they want a separate repository or not. In case they are not fine with the default they have of course to do some work. _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
