> On July 17, 2011, 8:25 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote: > > I know this discussion was held before, but I don't really agree with this. > > What if the user wants to connect it later (and since there is no other way > > how to enable them than from KCM, he has to do it this way)? We should > > always provide a method for bringing the account online/offline manually if > > we want to do automagic.
Under what circumstance would you want to enable it without going online? It works for Empathy. If it causes issues we can always change it later. - David ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101980/#review4784 ----------------------------------------------------------- On July 17, 2011, 6 p.m., Paolo Capriotti wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101980/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 17, 2011, 6 p.m.) > > > Review request for Telepathy. > > > Summary > ------- > > As discussed on IRC: > > [18:13] <pcapriotti> the only question left, then, is whether we want the > account to go online when we disable and reenable > [18:13] <d_ed> I'm fine with it. > [18:13] <d_ed> I think it's a good idea, the user has made a concious action, > they can't be surprised when it reconnects. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/kcm-telepathy-accounts.cpp 26e5f0b > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101980/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > open KCM, disable, reenable -> account online > > > Thanks, > > Paolo > >
_______________________________________________ KDE-Telepathy mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-telepathy
