On 05/12/13 13:00, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 12:57:16PM +0000, Anna Morris wrote: >>> Why not concentrate on a plugin system first? >> Hi, this is def a good idea! I am not a programmer at all, but I know >> how much an API type thing can help people to support a program. Is >> Kdenlive in a fit state for something like this to be achived? Or does >> this re-write need to happen first to get the "core" stable? > Plugin systems make things vastly more complicated, since you need to freeze > APIs and ABIs that used to be internal. If the problem is that Kdenlive is > too hard to develop, trying to make more things into plugins is > counterproductive.
I guess it's about aims and possibilities. It should be an aim to make it easier for more people to contrible to the code and to add features right? But is this possible? Can it be made possible? Anna
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base. Download it for free now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Kdenlive-devel mailing list Kdenlive-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
