Thanks Sten
> On 30 Oct 2024, at 14.24, Kevin P. Fleming <lists.kea-us...@kevin.km6g.us> > wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024, at 07:58, Hartmann, Jörg wrote: >> The error message is "no suitable subnet configured for a direct client". >> If i give the cisco phones a part of 192.168.22.0 they get IPs to. So it's a >> probably an error with the netmask which i dont understand. >> The server has 192.168.22.0/23 so 192.168.23.0/24 should be part of his >> address range. >> Could someone pls explain why the server dont distributes IPs from >> 192.168.23.0 ? > > If this server is also the default gateway for the phones, then this will not > work as 192.168.22.10 is not part of 192.168.23.0/24 and the devices in that > subnet will not be able to reach the gateway. Actually: Id 1 does have a router Id 2 does NOT have a router > > -- > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. > Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. > > To unsubscribe visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users. > > Kea-users mailing list > Kea-users@lists.isc.org <mailto:Kea-users@lists.isc.org> > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users
-- ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. To unsubscribe visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users. Kea-users mailing list Kea-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users
