Le 05/04/16 00:31, Zheng, Kai a écrit : > Hi Julian, > > Thanks for your feedback and suggestion. It would be probably my bad. What we > want is, by thru some RC releases, the code base can be mature and the major > 1.0.0 release then be out. I thought we should have used 'M'(milestone) > instead of 'RC' for this purpose? Emmanuel did mention this idea some time > before, but considering the change may cause messy we don't do it. I guess we > can consider different release name strategy after 1.0.0 accordingly?
LMilestone is good when you are changing the API, otherwise going through many RC is not necessarily bad. It's a choice the project make, it does just convey a message : "we are not yet ready to get a GA out, but we are working on it".
