On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 05:34:18AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Laura Abbott <labb...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 11/10/2017 11:48 AM, Don Zickus wrote: > >> > >> Hi Laura, > >> > >> As per our conversation, here is my pull request for the config changes: > >> https://pagure.io/fedora-kernel-dzickus.git rh_sync > >> > >> > >> As part of an effort to foster better cross collaboration with internal > >> Red > >> Hat kernels, align the configs layout to match that kernel. This will > >> allow > >> Red Hat engineers to provide easier guidance on how to set various config > >> options. > >> > >> In addition, the scripts that process the config options will migrate to > >> the > >> configs/ directory too. Future config workflows will stage all work in > >> the > >> configs/ area. > >> > >> A simple diff between the kernels will easily expose which config options > >> are different. Reading the comments in the file provides guidance to > >> Fedora > >> to determine if that kernel should make a similar change or not. While > >> the > >> RH kernel stays internal, requested changes will be posted publicly for > >> review with said reason. > >> > >> Rename debugconfig -> configs/base-debug > >> Rename baseconfig -> configs/base-generic > > Any chance we could drop the base- in those names and just have > configs/debug/ > configs/generic > > The base- is somewhat superfluous and is annoying for auto complete ;-)
It is, but was specifically added so kernels that want to do overrides like RHEL could add their own custom configs/debug and configs/generic. I am open to name changes but the goal was to use Fedora configs as a base and then allow the ability to override through other directories. So if you have a proposal to allow that, I am open to it. :-) Cheers, Don _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
