"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> writes: > On 12/27/2010 11:40 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>> >>> OK, that's straightforward. That presumably means that the low 640K is >>> marked unused in the memory map that memblock sees during early startup. >>> That fits very cleanly with the patches I'm doing. >> >> Additionally we typically start with maxcpus=1 so we don't strictly >> need the trampoline to start other cpus. >> > > Well, the trampoline is optional only on 32 bits, and with my changes, > it would be unconditional.
What motivates your trampoline rewrite? Eric _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
