On 12/28/2010 08:13 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> Well, the trampoline is optional only on 32 bits, and with my changes,
>> it would be unconditional.
>
> What motivates your trampoline rewrite?
>
The fact that so far four different pieces of code have low memory
trampolines, and each is implemented differently. Furthermore, I'm
currently being forced to work on a fifth. This unifies all that code,
but it also makes it unconditional since at least reboot=bios is always
going to need to be there.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
