> In this instance I honestly haven't read the LLM explanation. I agree > with you that the explanation is flawed, but the patch clearly fixes a > problem: > > "On AMD dGPUs this can lead to failed suspends under memory > pressure situations as all VRAM must be evicted to system memory > or swap." > > So it was included in the AUTOSEL patchset.
Is "may fix a problem" the only criteria for -stable inclusion? You
have been acting as if so. Please update the rules, if so.
> > I assume going forward that AUTOSEL will not consider any patches
> > involving the core kernel and the user/kernel ABI going forward. The
> > areas I have been involved with over the years, and for which my review
> > might be interesting.
>
> The filter is based on authorship and SoBs. Individual maintainers of a
> subsystem can elect to have their entire subsystem added to the ignore
> list.
Then the filter is misdesigned.
BR,
Pavel
--
I don't work for Nazis and criminals, and neither should you.
Boycott Putin, Trump, and Musk!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
