On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 10:52:18PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > >to fix some of these issues happily reviewed :) > > Erm, it's either you created the trees too soon, or we (most probably) > dalayed with updating the patches too much. The thing is, I have reworked > TX49 driver and also renamed it following the recent, suffixing scheme -- I > know git can handle renames but patch(1) cannot. How should we handle this?
OK, I'll try and follow up to one of the other emails so people have less of an excuse for not seeing things, but.. My preference for getting changes to KGDB is still with plain old GNU patches. Generating these is really up to the preference of the developer. If you like using git to track your own work, grab one of the regular git versions of the tree, work, export and email. If you like using stacked git, grab the stacked git tree and work on top of what I've done already, export and mail. Sound sane? This is because in the end, I'm trying to keep, roughly, the series of patches we have today, the clean core/drivers/arches and then the not so clean drivers/features. -- Tom Rini ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Kgdb-bugreport mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
