On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 09:48:04PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote: > On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 07:23 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 09:21:43PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote: > > > > > > where > > > > it flows down to (w/o extracting and redoing the changes), which is why > > > > I want people to still send regular GNU patches, for the time being. > > > > > > How is Andrew dealing with git flows yet still being able to make broken > > > out patches? > > > > He tracks external git trees as a single patch. But when the external > > tree wishes to submit itself for inclusion to Linus, the maintainer > > sends the patch set. > > > > Sigh, I tried the git repository in a simple environment with only > a SINGLE CPU. It seems to run as expected other than the back trace > being totally useless. I had to set back trace limit 100 to prevent > ddd/gdb from looping indefinitely trying to walk up the stack. This > is totally stupid. gdb only sees the top level function!
Can you please describe what you did? As I said in my email about that repository, simple tests work for me. I thought I was even forcing the unwind options to be on, but perhaps they weren't. Also, what toolchain is this with? I was using gcc-3.4.3. -- Tom Rini ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Kgdb-bugreport mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
