what you say seems reasonable. i was not trying to change any of the module numbers. i had only made some changes to the wiring and then ran netlist to include the changes in the pcb layout. netlist (or something) made changes in the numbering of the modules in the eeschema drawing when i went back and looked. very frustrating!!
erc ran ok. it is version 2007-07-09 thanks dave yajeed2000 wrote: > Hi, > When making changes in the schematic you have the option of re > annotating (renumbering)new symbols/parts only or all of them at once. > Before creating the netlist did you do an electrical rule check and > did you reannotate the schematic. It's best to follow these steps when > making changes. > Also which version are you using just in case it's a bug (for the > benefit of developers please mention this). > > David. > > --- In [email protected], dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >>Dan Andersson wrote: >> >>>On Sunday 25 November 2007 07:15:05 dave wrote: >>> >>> >>>>what am i doing wrong? >>>> >>>>i drew up a schematic and made a netlist and started to layout the > > board. i > >>>>found an error and when i went back to correct it and then make a new >>>>netlist the program changed several part numbers.. so then it > > gave me an > >>>>error when it read the new netlist in the pcb layout program. >>>> >>>>it is driving me nuts!!! >>>> >>>>am i doing something wrong or is there a problem with the program? >>>> >>>> >>>>thanks for the help >>>> >>>>dave. >>> >>> >>>The pcb layout does not replace or change modules as default, you > > need to tick > >>>the correct box for that in the net list read window. >>> >>>//Dan >> >> >>yes. this i understand. the problem is that in the eeschema program > > when i make changes and a make new netlist several part numbers ie: > U12, U13, U14 are changed to U055, U056, U057 in the eeschema drawing > and in the net list and then in the pcb drawing and that causes the > traces that were on the old parts to have no connections? > >>something is wrong somewhere, but is it something i am doing or is > > there a bug in the program? > >> >>dave >> >
