Andy Eskelson wrote: > Ignore the warning a carry on. I think it's dangerous to make users ignore warnings or errors. It's very easy to miss a genuine one if you're already expecting some non-zero amount of complaints.
> Modify the rules so that the warning is not generated. That's rather sweeping as well. Furthermore, the rules get reset each time you run eeschema, so the workflow would get rather messy. I wouldn't care so much about unspec pins, but it's also fairly common to spread a high-current output over multiple pins, and this also gets us conflicts. A similar case would be multiple power sources in a serial or parallel configuration. One solution may be to have a list of known exceptions that are then ignored. I just posted a proof of concept implementation to the kicad-devel list. An example of such an exception file is here: http://svn.openmoko.org/trunk/gta02-core/gta02-core.erx Using component references and pin numbers gives use very fine granularity. I.e., one can silence precisely the one error that's not an error, without affecting anything else. - Werner
