Hi Ilian, Sorry for late response, I finally got this situation sorted, for some reason my system couldnt run sesame and kim in the same jvm.. i think.
Now to move on, is there any user docs besides whats available on the kim website? I am having an issue where I have loaded a doc on to kim using the toolPopulate script but it doesnt seem to be correctly annotated. I think only one NE is being found. for example this url: http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6311941.stm This is just a random url i picked as a test but I think only one NE is being found and correctly annotated. Is there any other config param I have set or something? I am assuming all the ontology based annotations would have been processed as well afte running the toolPopulate script; Thanks. On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 16:11 +0200, Ilian Kitchukov wrote: > Hi Fadzi, > > This is not a common problem, so please, provide us with more information: > - What OS do you use? > - What version of KIM? > - Does this problem appear on KIM start? > - Have you modified some KIM configs or scripts? > - Do you have a separate installation of Sesame or some other process > running the RMI Registry? > > Thanks, > Ilian > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Fadzi Ushewokunze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: 24 January 2007, Wednesday 14:13 > Subject: [KIM-discussion] ClassNotFoundException > > > > Hi there, > > > > I am doing an installation of the platform and I am getting this > > exception. Not exactly sure whats causing this. > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Fadzi > > > > ==> > > > > KIMService is not registered due to : > > java.rmi.ServerException: RemoteException occurred in server thread; > > nested exception is: > > java.rmi.UnmarshalException: error unmarshalling arguments; > > nested exception is: > > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Cached loader got a known bad > > class name: org.openrdf .util.rmirouting.ChannelIfaceImpl_Stub (no > > security manager: RMI class loader disabled) > > at > > sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.oldDispatch(UnicastServerRef.java:352) > > at > > sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch(UnicastServerRef.java:207) > > at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:148) > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall(Transport.java:144) > > at > > sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.handleMessages(TCPTransport.java:460) > > at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport > > $ConnectionHandler.run(TCPTransport.java:701) > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534) > > at > > sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.exceptionReceivedFromServer(StreamRemoteCall.java > > > > :247) > > at > > sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.executeCall(StreamRemoteCall.java:223) > > at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java:350) > > at sun.rmi.registry.RegistryImpl_Stub.bind(Unknown Source) > > at > > com.ontotext.kim.FactoryInterfaceImpl.bind(FactoryInterfaceImpl.java:74) > > at com.ontotext.kim.KIMServer.main(KIMServer.java:27) > > Caused by: java.rmi.UnmarshalException: error unmarshalling arguments; > > nested exception is: > > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Cached loader got a known bad > > class name: org.openrdf .util.rmirouting.ChannelIfaceImpl_Stub (no > > security manager: RMI class loader disabled) > > at sun.rmi.registry.RegistryImpl_Skel.dispatch(Unknown Source) > > at > > sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.oldDispatch(UnicastServerRef.java:342) > > at > > sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch(UnicastServerRef.java:207) > > at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:148) > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NOTE: Please REPLY TO ALL to ensure that your reply reaches all members of > > this mailing list. > > > > KIM-discussion mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion_ontotext.com > > > > > > __________ NOD32 2001 (20070124) Information __________ > > > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ NOTE: Please REPLY TO ALL to ensure that your reply reaches all members of this mailing list. KIM-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion_ontotext.com
