Hello all, Sorry for the late reply. What I can say is that I'm sad about Matthew's decision to leave. I think that you can stay be of the group contributing as much as you can; there was never a "minimun quantity" of commitment, and never will.
About me, well, thanks but I'm not sure this is either a decision to take without consulting everyone, or a promotion by acclamation; shouldn't you put it on vote? Moreover, I'm not yet much into this Apache thing, so I hardly know anything I have to do about heading up a project; I am maybe the last one to ask to in this case, maybe Pid is a better choice as I see he knows better how thinks must be done into the Apache world... Anyway, I really do hope you'll keep contributing. -- Ale P.S.: My account seems working now even for svn, thanks Kevan! On Sep 6, 2011, at 8:47 PM, Matthew Sacks wrote: > Is this recommended? > > On Sep 4, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > >> >> On Sep 1, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Matthew Sacks wrote: >> >>> Dear Kitty, >>> I regretfully announce my resignation from the Kitty project. I have been >>> consumed by other things, and there are more talented people than myself >>> working on this project. >>> I am not sure what the process is for this, but I would like Alessandro >>> Novarini to take my please in heading up the project, whether that is >>> official or unofficial by ASF guidelines. I will still deliver the Web site >>> as promised in JIRA, but it may be delayed for a couple of months. I will >>> remain on the list, if I am allowed to do so. >> >> Passing along a few more things... >> >> "responsibility" lies in membership in the Podling PMC. PMC's provide >> oversight of the project. PMC members have an obligation to provide this >> oversight for the project. Committers do not have this responsibility. So, >> one other possibility is for you to resign from the Podling PMC, but >> maintain your committer status. >> >> --kevan >> >> >
