On Sep 6, 2011, at 2:47 PM, Matthew Sacks wrote: > Is this recommended?
I'm not sure what "this" is. I recommend you maintain your committer status with the podling. When the podling graduates, you (and project members) can decide if you want to remain a committer on the project. Your choice on Podling PMC membership. If you feel you'll read the mailing list and will maintain some oversight of the project, then feel free to remain a PPMC member. If you're disconnecting from the project, won't be reading mailing list, etc -- then I'd recommend you resign from the PPMC, but maintain your committer status... --kevan > > On Sep 4, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > >> >> On Sep 1, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Matthew Sacks wrote: >> >>> Dear Kitty, >>> I regretfully announce my resignation from the Kitty project. I have been >>> consumed by other things, and there are more talented people than myself >>> working on this project. >>> I am not sure what the process is for this, but I would like Alessandro >>> Novarini to take my please in heading up the project, whether that is >>> official or unofficial by ASF guidelines. I will still deliver the Web site >>> as promised in JIRA, but it may be delayed for a couple of months. I will >>> remain on the list, if I am allowed to do so. >> >> Passing along a few more things... >> >> "responsibility" lies in membership in the Podling PMC. PMC's provide >> oversight of the project. PMC members have an obligation to provide this >> oversight for the project. Committers do not have this responsibility. So, >> one other possibility is for you to resign from the Podling PMC, but >> maintain your committer status. >> >> --kevan >> >> >
