the reason is both economical and practical, since im not using
asterisk all the time, i thought it's a waste of resources if i
install asterisk on a dedicated box. but then file sharing is the
thing i use most of the time. actually, i installed asterisk on my
file server (it used to run on freebsd). its only cel700 with 256
pc100 ram, 30gb hda, 40gb hdc (dedicated for samba). i tested this on
asterisk only configuration and the outcome is satisfactory (for my
standard).
is it not possible to run both applications on one box or perhaps i
just missed something? help pls.
May I ask the reason of having both Asterisk and Samba together in a
single box?
I am experimenting now using AsteriskNOW which is a pre-built Linux
distro in itself that is a complete Asterisk system with everything
you need to use and administer Asterisk. I prefer to use the easy way
out. :).
On 12/22/06, mark navarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi all.
i just installed asterisk using the latest trixbox package. i
updated both the base (CentOS) os and asterisk using the
built-in scripts. it actually ran flawlessly until i
installed samba also using the built-in script. but this
somehow created a conflict and now i cannot access my
asterisk gui but i can open/browse/write to my samba
share.btw, i also installed another hdd exclusive for samba
(hdc1) and did the following:
--
_______________________________________________
Search for products and services at:
http://search.mail.com
Powered by Outblaze
_________________________________________________
Kagay-Anon Linux Users' Group (KLUG) Mailing List
[email protected] (http://cdo.linux.org.ph)
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
