Hello,


[atomic]:
I'm still having the problem:
http://beefy10.nyi.freebsd.org/data/110i386-default/444089/logs/knot2-2.4.3.log

I tried to solve the problem, but when upgrading to 2.5.1 I marked it broken 
for i386.
Meanwhile, after this problem:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220241
I've upgraded the port to 2.5.2.
Now when I test explicit with gcc or clang I still get atomic issues on i386.


[libknot]:
The cascading result is knot-resolver also doesn't install (on i386),
since it's depending on knot2 to install libknot.

So, I in my dev env I made a seperate port for libknot that would use knot2 
distro;
that installs on i386 without atomic issues, and so i386 users would be able 
install knot-resolver again.

But it's a bit complicated to avoid collisions with these two (or actually 
three)
when using both knot2 and knot-resolver (or removing knot2 and keeping 
knot-resolver).

So before I continue in making a meta-port or the knot2 port, just for the sake 
of libknot,
I'm wondering;
wouldn't other OS'es packaging systems not benefit from having libknot seperate 
from knot?


--

Met vriendelijke groet,
With kind regards,


Leo Vandewoestijne
<[email protected]>
<www.dns.company>




On Tue, 07 Feb 2017, [email protected] wrote:

> Hi Leo,
> 
> The attached patch could help.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> On 2017-02-07 13:14, Leo Vandewoestijne wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 
> > I tried to install knot 2.4.0 on FreeBSD 10.3 & 11.0.
> > On amd64 these complete fine, however on i386 they don't:
> > 
> > https://dns.company/downloads/knot2/knot2-2.4.0_103i386.log
> > https://dns.company/downloads/knot2/knot2-2.4.0_110i386.log
> > 
> > Is there anything I can do better to prevent this?

> diff --git a/src/knot/nameserver/query_module.h 
> b/src/knot/nameserver/query_module.h
> index a8e8c41..2b47798 100644
> --- a/src/knot/nameserver/query_module.h
> +++ b/src/knot/nameserver/query_module.h
____________________________________________ >8   etc.
_______________________________________________
knot-dns-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users

Reply via email to